AOD vs FLGV
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Franklin US Treasury Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
FLGV has a lower expense ratio. AOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. AOD offers more diversification with 85 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | FLGV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.09% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $1.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.72% | 4.11% | |
| Holdings | 86 | 47 | |
| YTD Return | +18.81% | -0.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.65% | +1.25% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.20% | +3.39% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.13% | -0.56% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 5.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.1% | -18.4% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | Jun 9, 2020 |
AOD vs FLGV Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Franklin US Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year AOD returned +32.65% while FLGV returned +1.25%. Year to date, AOD is up 18.81% versus a loss of 0.43% for FLGV.
Over three years, AOD compounded at +23.20% per year against +3.39% for FLGV; over five years the annualized figures are +11.13% and -0.56% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, FLGV has the edge at -0.90% annualized vs -4.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 5.0% for FLGV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.1% for AOD and -18.4% for FLGV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while FLGV charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $9 annually, a gap of $107 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 11.72% against 4.11% for FLGV.
Holdings Overlap
AOD and FLGV share 0 holdings out of 126 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or FLGV?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while FLGV charges 0.09%. FLGV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $107 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AOD or FLGV?
Over the past year AOD returned +32.65% vs +1.25% for FLGV, so AOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), AOD annualized -4.01% vs -0.90% for FLGV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AOD or FLGV?
AOD has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 5.0% for FLGV. Worst drawdown: AOD -88.1% vs FLGV -18.4%.
Should I hold both AOD and FLGV?
AOD and FLGV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AOD and FLGV?
AOD and FLGV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 126 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or FLGV?
AOD yields 11.72% while FLGV yields 4.11%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.