AOD vs FMO
AOD vs FMO
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Fiduciary/Claymore Energy Infrastructure Fund
Quick Verdict
AOD offers more diversification with 85 holdings.
Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: TiedMore Diversified: AOD
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | FMO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | - | |
| AUM | $1.0B | - | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.72% | - | |
| Holdings | 86 | 0 | |
| YTD Return | +18.47% | - | |
| 1Y Return | +32.42% | - | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.11% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.16% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | - | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.1% | - | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Fiduciary/Claymore Energy Infrastructure Fund | |
| Category | Equity | - | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | - |
AOD vs FMO Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Fiduciary/Claymore Energy Infrastructure Fund (FMO) is a ETF from Fiduciary/Claymore Energy Infrastructure Fund.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
Frequently Asked Questions
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.