AOD vs HCOM
AOD vs HCOM
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF
Quick Verdict
HCOM has a lower expense ratio. AOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. AOD offers more diversification with 85 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | HCOM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.59% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $9M | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.72% | 10.95% | |
| Holdings | 86 | 55 | |
| YTD Return | +18.03% | +0.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.72% | -4.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.88% | -6.95% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.28% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 14.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.1% | -28.8% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Hartford Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Commodity | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | Sep 14, 2021 |
AOD vs HCOM Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Hartford Schroders Commodity Strategy ETF (HCOM) is a ETF from Hartford Funds. Over the past year AOD returned +34.72% while HCOM returned -4.90%. Year to date, AOD is up 18.03% versus a gain of 0.71% for HCOM.
Over three years, AOD compounded at +22.88% per year against -6.95% for HCOM. Across the full 4-year window we track, HCOM has the edge at +0.68% annualized vs -4.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 14.7% for HCOM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.1% for AOD and -28.8% for HCOM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.28. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while HCOM charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $59 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 11.72% against 10.95% for HCOM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or HCOM?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while HCOM charges 0.59%. HCOM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AOD or HCOM?
Over the past year AOD returned +34.72% vs -4.90% for HCOM, so AOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), AOD annualized -4.05% vs +0.68% for HCOM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AOD or HCOM?
AOD has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 14.7% for HCOM. Worst drawdown: AOD -88.1% vs HCOM -28.8%.
Should I hold both AOD and HCOM?
AOD and HCOM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.28, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or HCOM?
AOD yields 11.72% while HCOM yields 10.95%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.