AOD vs HFXI
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs NYLI FTSE International Equity Currency Neutral ETF
Quick Verdict
HFXI has a lower expense ratio. AOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. HFXI offers more diversification with 759 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | HFXI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.20% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $2.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.72% | 3.96% | |
| Holdings | 86 | 858 | |
| YTD Return | +18.81% | +18.37% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.65% | +31.28% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.20% | +21.18% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.13% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 13.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.1% | -34.2% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | INDEXIQ ETF TRUST | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | Jul 22, 2015 |
AOD vs HFXI Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and NYLI FTSE International Equity Currency Neutral ETF (HFXI) is a ETF from INDEXIQ ETF TRUST. Over the past year AOD returned +32.65% while HFXI returned +31.28%. Year to date, AOD is up 18.81% versus a gain of 18.37% for HFXI.
Over three years, AOD compounded at +23.20% per year against +21.18% for HFXI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.13% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, HFXI has the edge at +8.03% annualized vs -4.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 13.9% for HFXI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.1% for AOD and -34.2% for HFXI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while HFXI charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $20 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 11.72% against 3.96% for HFXI.
Holdings Overlap
AOD and HFXI share 29 holdings out of 815 unique holdings combined, representing a 12.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or HFXI?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while HFXI charges 0.20%. HFXI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AOD or HFXI?
Over the past year AOD returned +32.65% vs +31.28% for HFXI, so AOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), AOD annualized -4.01% vs +8.03% for HFXI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AOD or HFXI?
AOD has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 13.9% for HFXI. Worst drawdown: AOD -88.1% vs HFXI -34.2%.
Should I hold both AOD and HFXI?
AOD and HFXI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between AOD and HFXI?
AOD and HFXI share 29 common holdings with a 12.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 815 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or HFXI?
AOD yields 11.72% while HFXI yields 3.96%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.