AOD vs IGBH
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
IGBH has a lower expense ratio. AOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. AOD offers more diversification with 85 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | IGBH | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.14% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $203M | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.72% | 5.68% | |
| Holdings | 86 | 4,130 | |
| YTD Return | +18.47% | +1.39% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.42% | +5.28% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.11% | +7.45% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.16% | +5.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 7.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.1% | -38.9% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | Jul 22, 2015 |
AOD vs IGBH Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Long-Term Corporate Bond ETF (IGBH) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AOD returned +32.42% while IGBH returned +5.28%. Year to date, AOD is up 18.47% versus a gain of 1.39% for IGBH.
Over three years, AOD compounded at +23.11% per year against +7.45% for IGBH; over five years the annualized figures are +11.16% and +5.28% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, IGBH has the edge at +2.84% annualized vs -4.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 7.5% for IGBH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.1% for AOD and -38.9% for IGBH. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while IGBH charges 0.14%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $14 annually, a gap of $102 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 11.72% against 5.68% for IGBH.
Holdings Overlap
AOD and IGBH share 0 holdings out of 161 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or IGBH?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while IGBH charges 0.14%. IGBH is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $102 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AOD or IGBH?
Over the past year AOD returned +32.42% vs +5.28% for IGBH, so AOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), AOD annualized -4.03% vs +2.84% for IGBH. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AOD or IGBH?
AOD has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 7.5% for IGBH. Worst drawdown: AOD -88.1% vs IGBH -38.9%.
Should I hold both AOD and IGBH?
AOD and IGBH have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AOD and IGBH?
AOD and IGBH share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 161 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or IGBH?
AOD yields 11.72% while IGBH yields 5.68%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.