AOD vs IZRL
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund vs ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF
Quick Verdict
IZRL has a lower expense ratio. AOD delivered stronger 1-year returns. AOD offers more diversification with 85 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOD | IZRL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.16% | 0.49% | |
| AUM | $1.0B | $142M | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.72% | 2.55% | |
| Holdings | 86 | 63 | |
| YTD Return | +19.25% | -0.89% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.02% | +13.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.41% | +15.28% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.45% | -0.02% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 23.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -88.1% | -60.0% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Ark Invest | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2007 | Dec 4, 2017 |
AOD vs IZRL Performance
Abrdn Total Dynamic Dividend Fund (AOD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF (IZRL) is a ETF from Ark Invest. Over the past year AOD returned +34.02% while IZRL returned +13.90%. Year to date, AOD is up 19.25% versus a loss of 0.89% for IZRL.
Over three years, AOD compounded at +23.41% per year against +15.28% for IZRL; over five years the annualized figures are +11.45% and -0.02% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, IZRL has the edge at +5.38% annualized vs -4.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IZRL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.5% compared with 21.9% for AOD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -88.1% for AOD and -60.0% for IZRL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOD charges 1.16% per year while IZRL charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $116 vs $49 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOD currently yields 11.72% against 2.55% for IZRL.
Holdings Overlap
AOD and IZRL share 0 holdings out of 151 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOD or IZRL?
AOD has an expense ratio of 1.16% while IZRL charges 0.49%. IZRL is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $67 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AOD or IZRL?
Over the past year AOD returned +34.02% vs +13.90% for IZRL, so AOD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), AOD annualized -4.00% vs +5.38% for IZRL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AOD or IZRL?
IZRL has been the more volatile fund at 23.5% annualized versus 21.9% for AOD. Worst drawdown: AOD -88.1% vs IZRL -60.0%.
Should I hold both AOD and IZRL?
AOD and IZRL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between AOD and IZRL?
AOD and IZRL share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 151 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOD or IZRL?
AOD yields 11.72% while IZRL yields 2.55%, so AOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.