AOTG vs IVV
AOT Growth and Innovation ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, AOTG or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. AOTG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 66.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AOTG | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $105M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 43 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +17.09%Best | +11.57% |
| 1Y Return | +23.07%Best | +17.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.83%Best | +20.71% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.80% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.7% | 14.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -31.6% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.2 years | $26,406Best | $21,088 |
| Top 10 Weight | 66.8% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | AOT Invest | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 29, 2022 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 29, 2022 to Sep 10, 2026 (4.2 years).
AOTG vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.2 years both funds cover.
AOTG vs IVV Performance
AOT Growth and Innovation ETF (AOTG) is an ETF from AOT Invest and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AOTG returned +23.07% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, AOTG is up 17.09% versus a gain of 11.57% for IVV.
Over three years, AOTG compounded at +27.83% per year against +20.71% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, AOTG has the edge at +26.01% annualized vs +19.44%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AOTG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.7% compared with 14.7% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.6% for AOTG and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AOTG charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AOTG currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
74.5% of AOTG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 34.2% of IVV's money is in holdings AOTG also owns.
Most of AOTG is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
26 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in AOTG and 505 in IVV, against full books of 43 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 469 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for AOTG (65.1% of the fund), and 11 for AOTG that do not appear in IVV (11.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AOTG | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 11.13% | 7.98% | 3.15% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 12.96% | 1.18% | 11.78% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 10.19% | 1.51% | 8.68% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 4.36% | 5.44% | 1.08% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.31% | 4.01% | 0.30% |
| GOOGLAlphabet A Usd 0.001 | 3.80% | 3.19% | 0.61% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.78% | 2.56% | 0.22% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.45% | 2.98% | 1.53% |
| SNDKSandisk Corp/De | 3.62% | 0.30% | 3.32% |
| HOODRobinhood Markets Inc - A | 3.76% | 0.11% | 3.65% |
74.5% of AOTG is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AOTG or IVV?
AOTG has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AOTG or IVV?
Over the past year AOTG returned +23.07% vs +17.57% for IVV, so AOTG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), AOTG annualized +26.01% vs +19.44% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AOTG or IVV?
AOTG has been the more volatile fund at 25.7% annualized versus 14.7% for IVV. Worst drawdown: AOTG -31.6% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both AOTG and IVV?
AOTG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AOTG and IVV?
74.5% of AOTG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 34.2% of IVV's is in holdings AOTG also owns. They hold 26 positions in common, counted across the 42 positions we hold weights for in AOTG and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, AOTG or IVV?
AOTG yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than AOTG?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. AOTG led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 66.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.