ARKF vs CGRO

ARKF vs CGRO

Which is better, ARKF or CGRO?

Each has led over a different period.

ARKF has a lower expense ratio. ARKF led over 1Y and 3Y, CGRO over 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: ARKFHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricARKFCGRO
Expense Ratio0.75%Best0.89%
AUM$701M$2M
Dividend Yield0.09%3.41%
Holdings4133
YTD Return-1.18%Best-25.67%
1Y Return-18.79%Best-31.69%
3Y Return (annualized)+34.20%Best+1.93%
5Y Return (annualized)-0.95%+1.93%Best
Volatility (annualized)39.2%Best61.5%
Max Drawdown-78.6%-42.1%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$9,534$11,003Best
Fund FamilyArk InvestCORE VALUES ALPHA
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionFeb 1, 2019Oct 16, 2023

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 29, 2020 to Oct 9, 2026 (6.3 years).

ARKF vs CGRO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.3 years both funds cover.

Compare ARKF against instead:ARKF vs SPYARKF vs QQQARKF vs VOOARKF vs VTICGRO against:CGRO vs VXUS

ARKF vs CGRO Performance

ARK Blockchain & Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) is an ETF from Ark Invest and CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) is an ETF from CORE VALUES ALPHA. Over the past year ARKF returned -18.79% while CGRO returned -31.69%. Year to date, ARKF is down 1.18% versus a loss of 25.67% for CGRO.

Over three years, ARKF compounded at +34.20% per year against +1.93% for CGRO; over five years the annualized figures are -0.95% and +1.93% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, CGRO has the edge at +13.13% annualized vs +6.98%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

CGRO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 61.5% compared with 39.2% for ARKF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.6% for ARKF and -42.1% for CGRO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.02. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ARKF charges 0.75% per year while CGRO charges 0.89%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $89 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKF currently yields 0.09% against 3.41% for CGRO.

Holdings Overlap

CGRO already in ARKF10.0%

At least 10.0% of CGRO's money is in holdings ARKF also owns.

Stated as a floor: for ARKF, our book for it covers 90.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

CGRO and ARKF share little of their money.

2 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in ARKF and 32 in CGRO, against full books of 41 and 33.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ARKFWeight in CGRODifference
BABA:SHAlibaba Group Holding Limited Sponsored Adr (1 Ads : 0.125 Ordinary)0.06%8.08%8.02%
FUTU:HKFutu Holdings Ltd Sponsored Adr (1 Ads : 8 Ordinary)1.57%1.93%0.36%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of ARKF and CGRO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

ARKFCGRO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ARKF or CGRO?

ARKF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while CGRO charges 0.89%. ARKF is the cheaper option, by $14 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, ARKF or CGRO?

Over the past year ARKF returned -18.79% vs -31.69% for CGRO, so ARKF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), ARKF annualized +6.98% vs +13.13% for CGRO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, ARKF or CGRO?

CGRO has been the more volatile fund at 61.5% annualized versus 39.2% for ARKF. Worst drawdown: ARKF -78.6% vs CGRO -42.1%.

Should I hold both ARKF and CGRO?

ARKF and CGRO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.02, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between ARKF and CGRO?

At least 10.0% of CGRO's money is in holdings ARKF also owns. Our book for ARKF is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in ARKF and 32 in CGRO.

Which pays a higher dividend, ARKF or CGRO?

ARKF yields 0.09% while CGRO yields 3.41%, so CGRO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is CGRO better than ARKF?

ARKF has a lower expense ratio. ARKF led over 1Y and 3Y, CGRO over 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.