CGRO vs VXUS
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, CGRO or VXUS?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. CGRO led over the full window, VXUS over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CGRO | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.89% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.41% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 35 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | -25.01% | +12.82%Best |
| 1Y Return | -31.95% | +19.86%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.28% | +19.33%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.28% | +9.46%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 62.1% | 14.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -42.1% | -29.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $11,193 | $15,714Best |
| Fund Family | CORE VALUES ALPHA | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 16, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 29, 2020 to Sep 18, 2026 (6.2 years).
CGRO vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.2 years both funds cover.
CGRO vs VXUS Performance
CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) is an ETF from CORE VALUES ALPHA and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CGRO returned -31.95% while VXUS returned +19.86%. Year to date, CGRO is down 25.01% versus a gain of 12.82% for VXUS.
Over three years, CGRO compounded at +2.28% per year against +19.33% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +2.28% and +9.46% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, CGRO has the edge at +13.42% annualized vs +12.32%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
CGRO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 62.1% compared with 14.8% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.1% for CGRO and -29.4% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.07. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CGRO charges 0.89% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $5 annually, a gap of $84 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CGRO currently yields 3.41% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 38.5% of CGRO's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 88.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
16 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in CGRO and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 35 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in CGRO | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 603259:SHWuxi Apptec Co Ltd-a | 5.68% | 0.01% | 5.67% |
| 300866:SHAnker Innovations Technology Co. Ltd. | 4.86% | 0.00% | 4.86% |
| 9880:SHUbtech Robotics Corp Ltd-H | 4.13% | 0.01% | 4.12% |
| 9660:HKHorizon Robotics | 3.19% | 0.01% | 3.18% |
| 600066:SHZhengzhou Yutong Bus Co. Ltd. Class A | 3.11% | 0.00% | 3.11% |
| 000333:SZMidea Group Co Ltd | 2.62% | 0.02% | 2.60% |
| PDD:IEPdd Holdings Inc. | 2.39% | 0.15% | 2.24% |
| 300750:SHContemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd. Class A | 2.18% | 0.04% | 2.14% |
| 600276:SHJiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceutic | 1.91% | 0.01% | 1.90% |
| 1024:HKKuaishou Technology | 1.88% | 0.04% | 1.84% |
38.5% of CGRO is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CGRO or VXUS?
CGRO has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $84 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CGRO or VXUS?
Over the past year CGRO returned -31.95% vs +19.86% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), CGRO annualized +13.42% vs +12.32% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, CGRO or VXUS?
CGRO has been the more volatile fund at 62.1% annualized versus 14.8% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: CGRO -42.1% vs VXUS -29.4%.
Should I hold both CGRO and VXUS?
CGRO and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.07, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between CGRO and VXUS?
At least 38.5% of CGRO's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in CGRO and 8,082 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, CGRO or VXUS?
CGRO yields 3.41% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so CGRO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than CGRO?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. CGRO led over the full window, VXUS over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.