ARKF vs VTI

ARKF vs VTI

Which is better, ARKF or VTI?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. ARKF led over 3Y, VTI over 1Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricARKFVTI
Expense Ratio0.75%0.03%Best
AUM$701M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.09%1.03%
Holdings413,543
YTD Return-7.12%+11.65%Best
1Y Return-16.92%+17.34%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+28.02%Best+20.35%
5Y Return (annualized)-3.14%+11.72%Best
Volatility (annualized)38.1%16.9%Best
Max Drawdown-78.6%-35.0%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$8,526$17,404Best
Fund FamilyArk InvestVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionFeb 1, 2019May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 4, 2019 to Sep 10, 2026 (7.6 years).

ARKF vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.6 years both funds cover.

ARKF vs VTI Performance

ARK Blockchain & Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) is an ETF from Ark Invest and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ARKF returned -16.92% while VTI returned +17.34%. Year to date, ARKF is down 7.12% versus a gain of 11.65% for VTI.

Over three years, ARKF compounded at +28.02% per year against +20.35% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -3.14% and +11.72% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +14.96% annualized vs +10.99%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ARKF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 38.1% compared with 16.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.6% for ARKF and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ARKF charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKF currently yields 0.09% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

ARKF already in VTI61.2%

At least 61.2% of ARKF's money is in holdings VTI also owns.

Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

The two holdings books were reported 48 days apart, ARKF as of Aug 17, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

20 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in ARKF and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 41 and 3,543.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ARKFWeight in VTIDifference
NVDANvidia Corp.2.96%6.32%3.36%
AMZNAmazon.Com Inc4.00%3.17%0.83%
SQBlock, Inc6.51%0.06%6.45%
PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc5.24%0.35%4.89%
HOODRobinhood Markets Inc - A5.38%0.11%5.27%
CRCLCircle Internet Group In5.19%0.01%5.18%
TOSTToast, Inc.5.02%0.02%5.00%
COINCoinbase Global, Inc.4.94%0.04%4.90%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc.3.45%1.30%2.15%
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.3.38%0.00%3.38%

61.2% of ARKF is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ARKFVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ARKF or VTI?

ARKF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, ARKF or VTI?

Over the past year ARKF returned -16.92% vs +17.34% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), ARKF annualized +10.99% vs +14.96% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, ARKF or VTI?

ARKF has been the more volatile fund at 38.1% annualized versus 16.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ARKF -78.6% vs VTI -35.0%.

Should I hold both ARKF and VTI?

ARKF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between ARKF and VTI?

At least 61.2% of ARKF's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in ARKF and 2,787 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, ARKF or VTI?

ARKF yields 0.09% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than ARKF?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. ARKF led over 3Y, VTI over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.