ARKF vs IVV
ARK Blockchain & Fintech Innovation ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ARKF or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ARKF led over 3Y, IVV over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKF | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $701M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.11% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 41 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -2.20% | +13.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | -11.19% | +20.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +30.51%Best | +21.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.97% | +12.88%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 38.0% | 16.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -78.6% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $8,601 | $18,327Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.1% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 1, 2019 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 4, 2019 to Sep 4, 2026 (7.6 years).
ARKF vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.6 years both funds cover.
ARKF vs IVV Performance
ARK Blockchain & Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) is an ETF from Ark Invest and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ARKF returned -11.19% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, ARKF is down 2.20% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Over three years, ARKF compounded at +30.51% per year against +21.29% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -2.97% and +12.88% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +15.86% annualized vs +11.77%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 38.0% compared with 16.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.6% for ARKF and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKF charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKF currently yields 0.11% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
41.6% of ARKF's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 16.4% of IVV's money is in holdings ARKF also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
11 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in ARKF and 504 in IVV, against full books of 41 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 482 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ARKF (82.8% of the fund), and 14 for ARKF that do not appear in IVV (33.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ARKF | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 2.96% | 7.98% | 5.02% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.00% | 4.01% | 0.01% |
| XYZBlock, Inc., 5951713.Sq.Fts.B | 6.51% | 0.07% | 6.44% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 5.24% | 0.55% | 4.69% |
| HOODRobinhood Markets Inc - A | 5.38% | 0.11% | 5.27% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 3.38% | 1.94% | 1.44% |
| COINCoinbase Global, Inc., Class A | 4.94% | 0.05% | 4.89% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.45% | 1.18% | 2.27% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc - A | 2.23% | 0.32% | 1.91% |
| ABNBAirbnb Inc | 1.97% | 0.10% | 1.87% |
41.6% of ARKF is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKF or IVV?
ARKF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ARKF or IVV?
Over the past year ARKF returned -11.19% vs +20.08% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), ARKF annualized +11.77% vs +15.86% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ARKF or IVV?
ARKF has been the more volatile fund at 38.0% annualized versus 16.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ARKF -78.6% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both ARKF and IVV?
ARKF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ARKF and IVV?
41.6% of ARKF's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 16.4% of IVV's is in holdings ARKF also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 38 positions we hold weights for in ARKF and 504 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKF or IVV?
ARKF yields 0.11% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ARKF?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ARKF led over 3Y, IVV over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.