ARKF vs IVV
ARK Blockchain & Fintech Innovation ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ARKF | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $701M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.11% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 41 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -11.84% | +12.96% | |
| 1Y Return | -22.11% | +20.70% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.92% | +22.10% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -3.39% | +13.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 37.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -78.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Ark Invest | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 1, 2019 | May 15, 2000 |
ARKF vs IVV Performance
ARK Blockchain & Fintech Innovation ETF (ARKF) is a ETF from Ark Invest and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ARKF returned -22.11% while IVV returned +20.70%. Year to date, ARKF is down 11.84% versus a gain of 12.96% for IVV.
Over three years, ARKF compounded at +28.92% per year against +22.10% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -3.39% and +13.40% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, ARKF has the edge at +10.32% annualized vs +7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ARKF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 37.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.6% for ARKF and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ARKF charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ARKF currently yields 0.11% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ARKF and IVV share 11 holdings out of 531 unique holdings combined, representing a 11.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ARKF or IVV?
ARKF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ARKF or IVV?
Over the past year ARKF returned -22.11% vs +20.70% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), ARKF annualized +10.32% vs +7.01% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ARKF or IVV?
ARKF has been the more volatile fund at 37.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ARKF -78.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ARKF and IVV?
ARKF and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ARKF and IVV?
ARKF and IVV share 11 common holdings with a 11.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 531 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ARKF or IVV?
ARKF yields 0.11% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.