ASCE vs CVSM
Allspring SMID Core ETF vs CresAlta Small and Mid-Cap ETF
Which is better, ASCE or CVSM?
ASCE costs less.
ASCE has a lower expense ratio. ASCE is less concentrated, with 27.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 32.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASCE | CVSM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38%Best | 0.55% |
| AUM | $193M | $89M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.17% | 0.23% |
| Holdings | 52 | 146 |
| YTD Return | +21.45%Best | -0.95% |
| 1Y Return | +29.13% | - |
| Top 10 Weight | 27.3%Best | 32.3% |
| Fund Family | Allspring Global Investments | CresAlta Investment Management, Inc. |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 8, 2025 | May 18, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
ASCE vs CVSM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ASCE vs CVSM Performance
Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) is an ETF from Allspring Global Investments and CresAlta Small and Mid-Cap ETF (CVSM) is an ETF from CresAlta Investment Management, Inc.. Year to date, ASCE is up 21.45% versus a loss of 0.95% for CVSM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASCE charges 0.38% per year while CVSM charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $55 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ASCE currently yields 0.17% against 0.23% for CVSM.
Holdings Overlap
3.8% of ASCE's money is in holdings CVSM also owns. 3.6% of CVSM's money is in holdings ASCE also owns.
ASCE and CVSM share little of their money.
2 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ASCE and 48 in CVSM, against full books of 52 and 146.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 46 positions for CVSM that do not appear in our book for ASCE (96.2% of the fund), and 46 for ASCE that do not appear in CVSM (90.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ASCE and CVSM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASCE or CVSM?
ASCE has an expense ratio of 0.38% while CVSM charges 0.55%. ASCE is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ASCE and CVSM?
3.8% of ASCE's money is in holdings CVSM also owns. 3.6% of CVSM's is in holdings ASCE also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 50 positions we hold weights for in ASCE and 48 in CVSM.
Which pays a higher dividend, ASCE or CVSM?
ASCE yields 0.17% while CVSM yields 0.23%, so CVSM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is CVSM better than ASCE?
ASCE has a lower expense ratio. ASCE is less concentrated, with 27.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 32.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.