ASCE vs VTI
Allspring SMID Core ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ASCE delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ASCE | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | - | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | - | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +29.24% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +35.77% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Allspring Global Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 8, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
ASCE vs VTI Performance
Allspring SMID Core ETF (ASCE) is a ETF from Allspring Global Investments and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ASCE returned +35.77% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, ASCE is up 29.24% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.4% for ASCE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.2% for ASCE and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ASCE charges 0.38% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $3 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period.
Holdings Overlap
ASCE and VTI share 38 holdings out of 2796 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ASCE or VTI?
ASCE has an expense ratio of 0.38% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $35 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ASCE or VTI?
Over the past year ASCE returned +35.77% vs +22.19% for VTI, so ASCE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ASCE annualized +37.92% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ASCE or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.4% for ASCE. Worst drawdown: ASCE -9.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ASCE and VTI?
ASCE and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ASCE and VTI?
ASCE and VTI share 38 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2796 unique securities.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.