BBCA vs QQQ
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. BBCA delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBCA | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $11.4B | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.73% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 82 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +15.22% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.09% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.30% | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.7% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.8% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 7, 2018 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BBCA vs QQQ Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BBCA returned +32.09% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, BBCA is up 15.22% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Over three years, BBCA compounded at +24.30% per year against +26.64% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +13.05% and +15.36% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.14% annualized vs +11.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 18.7% for BBCA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.8% for BBCA and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBCA charges 0.19% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $18 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBCA currently yields 1.73% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BBCA and QQQ share 2 holdings out of 175 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBCA or QQQ?
BBCA has an expense ratio of 0.19% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBCA or QQQ?
Over the past year BBCA returned +32.09% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so BBCA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), BBCA annualized +11.85% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBCA or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 18.7% for BBCA. Worst drawdown: BBCA -42.8% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BBCA and QQQ?
BBCA and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBCA and QQQ?
BBCA and QQQ share 2 common holdings with a 0.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 175 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBCA or QQQ?
BBCA yields 1.73% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BBCA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.