BBCA vs SCHD
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. BBCA delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 104 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBCA | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $11.4B | $108.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.73% | 3.13% | |
| Holdings | 82 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +15.22% | +26.54% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.09% | +30.90% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.30% | +16.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | +9.65% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.7% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.8% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 7, 2018 | Oct 20, 2011 |
BBCA vs SCHD Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year BBCA returned +32.09% while SCHD returned +30.90%. Year to date, BBCA is up 15.22% versus a gain of 26.54% for SCHD.
Over three years, BBCA compounded at +24.30% per year against +16.29% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +13.05% and +9.65% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, BBCA has the edge at +11.85% annualized vs +11.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBCA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.7% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.8% for BBCA and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBCA charges 0.19% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $6 annually, a gap of $13 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBCA currently yields 1.73% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
BBCA and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 175 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBCA or SCHD?
BBCA has an expense ratio of 0.19% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $13 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBCA or SCHD?
Over the past year BBCA returned +32.09% vs +30.90% for SCHD, so BBCA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), BBCA annualized +11.85% vs +11.51% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBCA or SCHD?
BBCA has been the more volatile fund at 18.7% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: BBCA -42.8% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both BBCA and SCHD?
BBCA and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BBCA and SCHD?
BBCA and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 175 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBCA or SCHD?
BBCA yields 1.73% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.