BBCA vs VYM
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. BBCA delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBCA | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.19% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $11.4B | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.73% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 82 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +15.22% | +16.42% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.09% | +24.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.30% | +19.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.7% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -42.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 7, 2018 | Nov 10, 2006 |
BBCA vs VYM Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Canada ETF (BBCA) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBCA returned +32.09% while VYM returned +24.22%. Year to date, BBCA is up 15.22% versus a gain of 16.42% for VYM.
Over three years, BBCA compounded at +24.30% per year against +19.03% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +13.05% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, BBCA has the edge at +11.85% annualized vs +7.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBCA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.7% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.8% for BBCA and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBCA charges 0.19% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $19 vs $4 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBCA currently yields 1.73% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
BBCA and VYM share 0 holdings out of 678 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBCA or VYM?
BBCA has an expense ratio of 0.19% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BBCA or VYM?
Over the past year BBCA returned +32.09% vs +24.22% for VYM, so BBCA leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), BBCA annualized +11.85% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BBCA or VYM?
BBCA has been the more volatile fund at 18.7% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: BBCA -42.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both BBCA and VYM?
BBCA and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between BBCA and VYM?
BBCA and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 678 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBCA or VYM?
BBCA yields 1.73% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.