BBSC vs VTI
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Small Cap Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BBSC or VTI?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BBSC led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBSC | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $746M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.01% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 858 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +20.43%Best | +13.59% |
| 1Y Return | +25.06%Best | +20.00% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.17% | +20.95%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.56% | +11.81%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.6% | 15.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -31.0% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,396 | $17,474Best |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 16, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 17, 2020 to Sep 4, 2026 (5.8 years).
BBSC vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.8 years both funds cover.
BBSC vs VTI Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBSC returned +25.06% while VTI returned +20.00%. Year to date, BBSC is up 20.43% versus a gain of 13.59% for VTI.
Over three years, BBSC compounded at +18.17% per year against +20.95% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +7.56% and +11.81% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +14.70% annualized vs +11.45%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBSC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.6% compared with 15.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.0% for BBSC and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBSC charges 0.09% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBSC currently yields 1.01% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 76.5% of BBSC's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of BBSC is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
654 positions in common, counted across the 851 positions we hold weights for in BBSC and 2,788 in VTI, against full books of 858 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BBSC | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SMTCSemtech Corp | 0.49% | 0.02% | 0.47% |
| MOG.AMoog Inccommon Stock | 0.43% | 0.02% | 0.41% |
| AHRAmerican Healthcare REIT Inc | 0.41% | 0.01% | 0.40% |
| BTSGBrightspring Health Services Inc | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.33% |
| DOCNDigitalocean Holdings Inc | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.33% |
| FORMFormfactor, Inc. | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.33% |
| VSATViasat Inc.(vsat) | 0.34% | 0.02% | 0.32% |
| EATBrinker Intl Inc | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.36% |
| FROGJFrog Ltd. | 0.35% | 0.01% | 0.34% |
| KRYSKrystal Biotech Inc | 0.32% | 0.01% | 0.31% |
76.5% of BBSC is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBSC or VTI?
BBSC has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BBSC or VTI?
Over the past year BBSC returned +25.06% vs +20.00% for VTI, so BBSC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BBSC annualized +11.45% vs +14.70% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BBSC or VTI?
BBSC has been the more volatile fund at 20.6% annualized versus 15.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BBSC -31.0% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both BBSC and VTI?
BBSC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BBSC and VTI?
At least 76.5% of BBSC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 654 positions in common, counted across the 851 positions we hold weights for in BBSC and 2,788 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBSC or VTI?
BBSC yields 1.01% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BBSC?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BBSC led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.