BBSC vs VTI
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Small Cap Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BBSC or VTI?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BBSC led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BBSC is less concentrated, with 4.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBSC | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $731M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 858 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +14.11%Best | +12.43% |
| 1Y Return | +15.96%Best | +15.92% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.28% | +22.42%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.79% | +12.37%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.8% | 15.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -31.0% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,888 | $17,916Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 4.7%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 16, 2020 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 17, 2020 to Sep 28, 2026 (5.9 years).
BBSC vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.9 years both funds cover.
BBSC vs VTI Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Small Cap Equity ETF (BBSC) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBSC returned +15.96% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, BBSC is up 14.11% versus a gain of 12.43% for VTI.
Over three years, BBSC compounded at +18.28% per year against +22.42% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +6.79% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +14.32% annualized vs +10.29%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBSC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.8% compared with 15.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.0% for BBSC and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBSC charges 0.09% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBSC currently yields 1.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
95.0% of BBSC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.7% of VTI's money is in holdings BBSC also owns.
Most of BBSC is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
808 positions in common, counted across the 851 positions we hold weights for in BBSC and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 858 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 885 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for BBSC (94.8% of the fund), and 26 for BBSC that do not appear in VTI (3.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BBSC | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SMTCSemtech Corp | 0.49% | 0.02% | 0.47% |
| MOG.AMoog Inccommon Stock | 0.43% | 0.02% | 0.41% |
| AHRAmerican Healthcare REIT Inc | 0.41% | 0.02% | 0.39% |
| ARWRArrowhead Pharmaceuticals Inc | 0.41% | 0.02% | 0.39% |
| CORTCorcept Therapeutics Incorporated | 0.41% | 0.01% | 0.40% |
| EATBrinker International, Inc. | 0.36% | 0.01% | 0.35% |
| BTSGBrightspring Health | 0.35% | 0.01% | 0.34% |
| DOCNDigitalocean Holdings Inc | 0.35% | 0.01% | 0.34% |
| FORMFormfactor, Inc. | 0.35% | 0.01% | 0.34% |
| FROGJfrog Ltd | 0.35% | 0.01% | 0.34% |
95.0% of BBSC is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBSC or VTI?
BBSC has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BBSC or VTI?
Over the past year BBSC returned +15.96% vs +15.92% for VTI, so BBSC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BBSC annualized +10.29% vs +14.32% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BBSC or VTI?
BBSC has been the more volatile fund at 20.8% annualized versus 15.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BBSC -31.0% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both BBSC and VTI?
BBSC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BBSC and VTI?
95.0% of BBSC's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 2.7% of VTI's is in holdings BBSC also owns. They hold 808 positions in common, counted across the 851 positions we hold weights for in BBSC and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBSC or VTI?
BBSC yields 1.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BBSC?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BBSC led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. BBSC is less concentrated, with 4.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.