BCD vs QQQ
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. BCD delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCD | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $402M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 15.69% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 47 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +16.88% | +18.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.78% | +27.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.30% | +25.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.45% | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.8% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 30, 2017 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BCD vs QQQ Performance
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BCD returned +28.78% while QQQ returned +27.63%. Year to date, BCD is up 16.88% versus a gain of 18.20% for QQQ.
Over three years, BCD compounded at +11.30% per year against +25.54% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +11.45% and +15.12% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.11% annualized vs +8.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 12.9% for BCD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.8% for BCD and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.25. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCD charges 0.30% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $18 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCD currently yields 15.69% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BCD and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 105 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCD or QQQ?
BCD has an expense ratio of 0.30% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BCD or QQQ?
Over the past year BCD returned +28.78% vs +27.63% for QQQ, so BCD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), BCD annualized +8.78% vs +13.11% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BCD or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 12.9% for BCD. Worst drawdown: BCD -29.8% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BCD and QQQ?
BCD and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.25, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BCD and QQQ?
BCD and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 105 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCD or QQQ?
BCD yields 15.69% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so BCD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.