BCD vs VYM
BCD vs VYM
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. BCD delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCD | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $402M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 15.69% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 47 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +16.88% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.78% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.30% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.45% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.9% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 30, 2017 | Nov 10, 2006 |
BCD vs VYM Performance
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BCD returned +28.78% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, BCD is up 16.88% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, BCD compounded at +11.30% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +11.45% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, BCD has the edge at +8.78% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 12.9% for BCD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.8% for BCD and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCD charges 0.30% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $4 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCD currently yields 15.69% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
BCD and VYM share 0 holdings out of 560 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCD or VYM?
BCD has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $26 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BCD or VYM?
Over the past year BCD returned +28.78% vs +26.12% for VYM, so BCD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), BCD annualized +8.78% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BCD or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 12.9% for BCD. Worst drawdown: BCD -29.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both BCD and VYM?
BCD and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BCD and VYM?
BCD and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 560 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCD or VYM?
BCD yields 15.69% while VYM yields 2.86%, so BCD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.