BCD vs VTI
BCD vs VTI
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BCD delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCD | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $402M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 15.69% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 47 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +16.88% | +14.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.78% | +24.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.30% | +21.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.45% | +12.37% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 30, 2017 | May 24, 2001 |
BCD vs VTI Performance
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BCD returned +28.78% while VTI returned +24.16%. Year to date, BCD is up 16.88% versus a gain of 14.20% for VTI.
Over three years, BCD compounded at +11.30% per year against +21.12% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +11.45% and +12.37% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, BCD has the edge at +8.78% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.9% for BCD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.8% for BCD and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.40. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCD charges 0.30% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCD currently yields 15.69% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BCD and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2785 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCD or VTI?
BCD has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $27 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BCD or VTI?
Over the past year BCD returned +28.78% vs +24.16% for VTI, so BCD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), BCD annualized +8.78% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BCD or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.9% for BCD. Worst drawdown: BCD -29.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BCD and VTI?
BCD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.40, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BCD and VTI?
BCD and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2785 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCD or VTI?
BCD yields 15.69% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BCD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.