BCD vs VXUS
BCD vs VXUS
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. BCD delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCD | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $402M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 15.69% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 47 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +16.88% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.78% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.30% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.45% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Aberdeen | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 30, 2017 | Jan 26, 2011 |
BCD vs VXUS Performance
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Longer Dated Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCD) is a ETF from Aberdeen and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BCD returned +28.78% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, BCD is up 16.88% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, BCD compounded at +11.30% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +11.45% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, BCD has the edge at +8.78% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.9% for BCD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.8% for BCD and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCD charges 0.30% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $5 annually, a gap of $25 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCD currently yields 15.69% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
BCD and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7863 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCD or VXUS?
BCD has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $25 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BCD or VXUS?
Over the past year BCD returned +28.78% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so BCD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), BCD annualized +8.78% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BCD or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.9% for BCD. Worst drawdown: BCD -29.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both BCD and VXUS?
BCD and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BCD and VXUS?
BCD and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7863 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCD or VXUS?
BCD yields 15.69% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so BCD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.