BCUS vs VTI
Bancreek US Large Cap ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BCUS or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCUS | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $152M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.28% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 31 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +4.91% | +12.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +4.28% | +16.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.7% | 12.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.2%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $13,576 | $16,283Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.2% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Bancreek Capital Advisors | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 20, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 21, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (2.7 years).
BCUS vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.
BCUS vs VTI Performance
Bancreek US Large Cap ETF (BCUS) is an ETF from Bancreek Capital Advisors and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BCUS returned +4.28% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, BCUS is up 4.91% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BCUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.7% compared with 12.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.2% for BCUS and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCUS charges 0.70% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCUS currently yields 0.28% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
88.2% of BCUS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 13.9% of VTI's money is in holdings BCUS also owns.
Most of BCUS is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
27 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in BCUS and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 31 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,126 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for BCUS (83.6% of the fund), and 0 for BCUS that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BCUS | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.06% | 6.40% | 2.34% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.17% | 2.56% | 1.61% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 4.29% | 1.70% | 2.59% |
| 0RMV:LNTechnipfmc Plc Ordinary Shares | 4.18% | 0.04% | 4.14% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 2.79% | 1.35% | 1.44% |
| AMRXAmneal Pharmaceuticals Inc. | 3.98% | 0.00% | 3.98% |
| CRSCarpenter Technology Corpcommon Stock | 3.83% | 0.03% | 3.80% |
| IDCCInterdigital Inc | 3.84% | 0.01% | 3.83% |
| RCLRoyal Caribbean Cruises | 3.61% | 0.11% | 3.50% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 2.96% | 0.52% | 2.44% |
88.2% of BCUS is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCUS or VTI?
BCUS has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BCUS or VTI?
Over the past year BCUS returned +4.28% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BCUS or VTI?
BCUS has been the more volatile fund at 12.7% annualized versus 12.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BCUS -18.2% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both BCUS and VTI?
BCUS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BCUS and VTI?
88.2% of BCUS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 13.9% of VTI's is in holdings BCUS also owns. They hold 27 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in BCUS and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCUS or VTI?
BCUS yields 0.28% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BCUS?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.