BCUS vs QQQ
Bancreek US Large Cap ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BCUS | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $152M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.27% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 31 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +11.21% | +18.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.28% | +27.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.5% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.2% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Bancreek Capital Advisors | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 20, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BCUS vs QQQ Performance
Bancreek US Large Cap ETF (BCUS) is a ETF from Bancreek Capital Advisors and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BCUS returned +14.28% while QQQ returned +27.63%. Year to date, BCUS is up 11.21% versus a gain of 18.20% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 12.5% for BCUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.2% for BCUS and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BCUS charges 0.70% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $18 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BCUS currently yields 0.27% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BCUS and QQQ share 5 holdings out of 128 unique holdings combined, representing a 12.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BCUS or QQQ?
BCUS has an expense ratio of 0.70% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BCUS or QQQ?
Over the past year BCUS returned +14.28% vs +27.63% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BCUS annualized +15.07% vs +13.11% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BCUS or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 12.5% for BCUS. Worst drawdown: BCUS -18.2% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BCUS and QQQ?
BCUS and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BCUS and QQQ?
BCUS and QQQ share 5 common holdings with a 12.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 128 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BCUS or QQQ?
BCUS yields 0.27% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.