BETZ vs VOO
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BETZ | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $50M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.01% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 27 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -4.91% | +12.73% | |
| 1Y Return | -16.22% | +20.59% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.47% | +21.70% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -7.56% | +12.87% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.7% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -60.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 31, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BETZ vs VOO Performance
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BETZ returned -16.22% while VOO returned +20.59%. Year to date, BETZ is down 4.91% versus a gain of 12.73% for VOO.
Over three years, BETZ compounded at +6.47% per year against +21.70% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -7.56% and +12.87% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BETZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.7% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.8% for BETZ and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BETZ charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BETZ currently yields 5.01% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BETZ and VOO share 0 holdings out of 529 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BETZ or VOO?
BETZ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BETZ or VOO?
Over the past year BETZ returned -16.22% vs +20.59% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BETZ annualized +4.31% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BETZ or VOO?
BETZ has been the more volatile fund at 28.7% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BETZ -60.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BETZ and VOO?
BETZ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BETZ and VOO?
BETZ and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 529 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BETZ or VOO?
BETZ yields 5.01% while VOO yields 1.08%, so BETZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.