BETZ vs VTI
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BETZ or VTI?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BETZ | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $41M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.95% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 27 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -19.62% | +14.54%Best |
| 1Y Return | -23.00% | +16.83%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.55% | +22.56%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -9.70% | +12.76%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.1% | 15.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -60.8% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $6,004 | $18,230Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 58.6% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 31, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 4, 2020 to Oct 9, 2026 (6.3 years).
BETZ vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.3 years both funds cover.
BETZ vs VTI Performance
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BETZ returned -23.00% while VTI returned +16.83%. Year to date, BETZ is down 19.62% versus a gain of 14.54% for VTI.
Over three years, BETZ compounded at +3.55% per year against +22.56% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -9.70% and +12.76% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +16.38% annualized vs +1.50%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BETZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.1% compared with 15.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.8% for BETZ and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BETZ charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BETZ currently yields 4.95% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
21.9% of BETZ's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
BETZ and VTI share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, BETZ as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
4 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in BETZ and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 27 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,149 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for BETZ (97.4% of the fund), and 5 for BETZ that do not appear in VTI (19.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
21.9% of BETZ is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BETZ or VTI?
BETZ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BETZ or VTI?
Over the past year BETZ returned -23.00% vs +16.83% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BETZ annualized +1.50% vs +16.38% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BETZ or VTI?
BETZ has been the more volatile fund at 29.1% annualized versus 15.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BETZ -60.8% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both BETZ and VTI?
BETZ and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BETZ and VTI?
21.9% of BETZ's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.0% of VTI's is in holdings BETZ also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in BETZ and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, BETZ or VTI?
BETZ yields 4.95% while VTI yields 1.03%, so BETZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BETZ?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.