BETZ vs VYM
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BETZ | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $50M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.01% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 27 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | -5.12% | +15.42% | |
| 1Y Return | -16.40% | +22.36% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.84% | +19.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -7.04% | +12.20% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.7% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -60.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 31, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
BETZ vs VYM Performance
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BETZ returned -16.40% while VYM returned +22.36%. Year to date, BETZ is down 5.12% versus a gain of 15.42% for VYM.
Over three years, BETZ compounded at +6.84% per year against +19.06% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -7.04% and +12.20% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +4.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BETZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.7% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.8% for BETZ and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BETZ charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BETZ currently yields 5.01% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
BETZ and VYM share 1 holdings out of 626 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BETZ | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SGHC | 5.89% | 0.01% | 5.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BETZ or VYM?
BETZ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $71 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BETZ or VYM?
Over the past year BETZ returned -16.40% vs +22.36% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BETZ annualized +4.27% vs +7.04% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BETZ or VYM?
BETZ has been the more volatile fund at 28.7% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: BETZ -60.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both BETZ and VYM?
BETZ and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BETZ and VYM?
BETZ and VYM share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 626 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BETZ or VYM?
BETZ yields 5.01% while VYM yields 2.24%, so BETZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.