BETZ vs VXUS
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BETZ | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $50M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.01% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 27 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -6.07% | +15.23% | |
| 1Y Return | -15.98% | +26.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.67% | +20.86% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -6.77% | +9.66% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 28.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -60.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 31, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
BETZ vs VXUS Performance
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BETZ returned -15.98% while VXUS returned +26.78%. Year to date, BETZ is down 6.07% versus a gain of 15.23% for VXUS.
Over three years, BETZ compounded at +6.67% per year against +20.86% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -6.77% and +9.66% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.89% annualized vs +4.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BETZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 28.7% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.8% for BETZ and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BETZ charges 0.75% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $5 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BETZ currently yields 5.01% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
BETZ and VXUS share 11 holdings out of 7882 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BETZ or VXUS?
BETZ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $70 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BETZ or VXUS?
Over the past year BETZ returned -15.98% vs +26.78% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BETZ annualized +4.11% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BETZ or VXUS?
BETZ has been the more volatile fund at 28.7% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: BETZ -60.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both BETZ and VXUS?
BETZ and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BETZ and VXUS?
BETZ and VXUS share 11 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7882 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BETZ or VXUS?
BETZ yields 5.01% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so BETZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.