BETZ vs VXUS
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, BETZ or VXUS?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BETZ | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $41M | $164.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.95% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 27 | 8,844 |
| YTD Return | -22.36% | +12.44%Best |
| 1Y Return | -27.89% | +18.26%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.48% | +21.40%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -10.84% | +9.67%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 29.1% | 14.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -60.8% | -29.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $5,634 | $15,865Best |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 31, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 4, 2020 to Oct 2, 2026 (6.3 years).
BETZ vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.3 years both funds cover.
BETZ vs VXUS Performance
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) is an ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BETZ returned -27.89% while VXUS returned +18.26%. Year to date, BETZ is down 22.36% versus a gain of 12.44% for VXUS.
Over three years, BETZ compounded at +3.48% per year against +21.40% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -10.84% and +9.67% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +11.83% annualized vs +0.95%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BETZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 29.1% compared with 14.8% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.8% for BETZ and -29.4% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BETZ charges 0.75% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $5 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BETZ currently yields 4.95% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
At least 44.0% of BETZ's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 89.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, BETZ as of Sep 15, 2026 and VXUS as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
11 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in BETZ and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 27 and 8,844.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BETZ | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| EVOG:STEvolution AB | 8.43% | 0.02% | 8.41% |
| LTMC:MILottomatica Group Spa | 5.82% | 0.01% | 5.81% |
| LNWLight & Wonder Inc | 5.21% | 0.01% | 5.20% |
| FDJU:PAFdj United | 4.75% | 0.01% | 4.74% |
| ENT:IMEntain Plc | 4.39% | 0.01% | 4.38% |
| PTEC:IMPlaytech Plc | 4.26% | 0.00% | 4.26% |
| TAH:AUTabcorp Holdings Ltd | 3.52% | 0.00% | 3.52% |
| 9672:JPTokyotokeiba Co Ltd | 3.13% | 0.00% | 3.13% |
| BETCO:STBetter Collective A/S | 2.65% | 0.00% | 2.65% |
| JIN:AUJumbo Interactive Ltd | 1.87% | 0.00% | 1.87% |
44.0% of BETZ is already inside VXUS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BETZ or VXUS?
BETZ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $70 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BETZ or VXUS?
Over the past year BETZ returned -27.89% vs +18.26% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BETZ annualized +0.95% vs +11.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BETZ or VXUS?
BETZ has been the more volatile fund at 29.1% annualized versus 14.8% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: BETZ -60.8% vs VXUS -29.4%.
Should I hold both BETZ and VXUS?
BETZ and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BETZ and VXUS?
At least 44.0% of BETZ's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in BETZ and 8,082 in VXUS.
Which pays a higher dividend, BETZ or VXUS?
BETZ yields 4.95% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so BETZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than BETZ?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.