BFJA vs IVV
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BFJA | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $865,889 | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -14.11% | +13.43% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +22.61% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.47% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 9, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
BFJA vs IVV Performance
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January (BFJA) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, BFJA is down 14.11% versus a gain of 13.43% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for BFJA and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BFJA charges 0.90% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $3 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BFJA currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for IVV.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BFJA or IVV?
BFJA has an expense ratio of 0.90% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $87 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, BFJA or IVV?
BFJA yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.