BFJA vs VYM
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BFJA | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $865,889 | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -13.64% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 9, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
BFJA vs VYM Performance
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January (BFJA) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, BFJA is down 13.64% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for BFJA and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BFJA charges 0.90% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $4 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BFJA currently yields 0.00% against 2.86% for VYM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BFJA or VYM?
BFJA has an expense ratio of 0.90% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $86 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, BFJA or VYM?
BFJA yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.