BFJA vs QQQ
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BFJA | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.90% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $865,889 | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 9 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -14.11% | +17.46% | |
| 1Y Return | - | +26.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 9, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BFJA vs QQQ Performance
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January (BFJA) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, BFJA is down 14.11% versus a gain of 17.46% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for BFJA and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BFJA charges 0.90% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $18 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BFJA currently yields 0.00% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BFJA or QQQ?
BFJA has an expense ratio of 0.90% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which pays a higher dividend, BFJA or QQQ?
BFJA yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.