BGGG vs VTI
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BGGG or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGGG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $302M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 43 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -4.66% | +12.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.22% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.87% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.86% |
| Fund Family | Baillie Gifford Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 1, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
BGGG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BGGG vs VTI Performance
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF (BGGG) is an ETF from Baillie Gifford Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, BGGG is down 4.66% versus a gain of 12.57% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGGG charges 0.70% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGGG currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 45.9% of BGGG's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
17 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BGGG and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 43 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BGGG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 6.99% | 6.32% | 0.67% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.91% | 3.17% | 3.74% |
| NETCloudflare Inc (180 Day Lockup) | 5.68% | 0.11% | 5.57% |
| APPAppLovin Corp. Com Cl A | 4.19% | 0.19% | 4.00% |
| IOTSamsara Inc, Class A | 3.00% | 0.01% | 2.99% |
| RDDTReddit, Inc.: Class A | 2.69% | 0.03% | 2.66% |
| AXONAxon Enterprise Inc | 2.33% | 0.06% | 2.27% |
| ISRGIntuitive Surgical Inc | 1.93% | 0.19% | 1.74% |
| DXCMDexcom Inc. | 2.04% | 0.04% | 2.00% |
| RKLBRocket Lab Corporation | 1.76% | 0.08% | 1.68% |
45.9% of BGGG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGGG or VTI?
BGGG has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BGGG and VTI?
At least 45.9% of BGGG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BGGG and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGGG or VTI?
BGGG yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BGGG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.