BGGG vs VYM
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, BGGG or VYM?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGGG | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $302M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 43 | 613 |
| YTD Return | -5.05% | +13.15%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.82% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.99% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.16% |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.3% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Baillie Gifford Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jun 1, 2026 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BGGG vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BGGG vs VYM Performance
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF (BGGG) is an ETF from Baillie Gifford Funds and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, BGGG is down 5.05% versus a gain of 13.15% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGGG charges 0.70% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $4 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGGG currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 41 holdings in BGGG and 603 in VYM, totalling 100.0% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BGGG and 603 in VYM, against full books of 43 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 568 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for BGGG (97.5% of the fund), and 24 for BGGG that do not appear in VYM (57.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BGGG and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGGG or VYM?
BGGG has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $66 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGGG or VYM?
BGGG yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than BGGG?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.