BGGG vs IVV
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BGGG or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGGG | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $302M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 43 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -5.05% | +11.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.71% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.80% |
| Top 10 Weight | 48.3% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Baillie Gifford Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 1, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
BGGG vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
BGGG vs IVV Performance
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth ETF (BGGG) is an ETF from Baillie Gifford Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, BGGG is down 5.05% versus a gain of 11.57% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGGG charges 0.70% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGGG currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
25.7% of BGGG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 12.9% of IVV's money is in holdings BGGG also owns.
BGGG and IVV share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BGGG and 505 in IVV, against full books of 43 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 488 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for BGGG (86.4% of the fund), and 17 for BGGG that do not appear in IVV (31.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
25.7% of BGGG is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGGG or IVV?
BGGG has an expense ratio of 0.70% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between BGGG and IVV?
25.7% of BGGG's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 12.9% of IVV's is in holdings BGGG also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 41 positions we hold weights for in BGGG and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGGG or IVV?
BGGG yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BGGG?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.