BJK vs QQQ
VanEck Gaming ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BJK | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.51% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $18M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.70% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -11.89% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.45% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -5.64% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -7.11% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.7% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -78.8% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 22, 2008 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BJK vs QQQ Performance
VanEck Gaming ETF (BJK) is a ETF from VanEck and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BJK returned +7.45% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, BJK is down 11.89% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, BJK compounded at -5.64% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -7.11% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +1.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 27.7% for BJK. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.8% for BJK and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BJK charges 0.51% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $51 vs $18 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BJK currently yields 3.70% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BJK and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 136 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BJK or QQQ?
BJK has an expense ratio of 0.51% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $33 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BJK or QQQ?
Over the past year BJK returned +7.45% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), BJK annualized +1.52% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BJK or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 27.7% for BJK. Worst drawdown: BJK -78.8% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BJK and QQQ?
BJK and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BJK and QQQ?
BJK and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 136 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BJK or QQQ?
BJK yields 3.70% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BJK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.