BJK vs IVV
VanEck Gaming ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, BJK or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BJK | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.51% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $18M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.70% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 38 | 508 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.7% | 15.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -78.8% | -52.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 18.2 years | $13,159 | $54,011Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 58.8% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 22, 2008 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 149 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. BJK has data through Apr 8, 2026 and IVV through Sep 4, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 18.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 24, 2008 to Apr 8, 2026 (18.2 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BJK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.7% compared with 15.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.8% for BJK and -52.4% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BJK charges 0.51% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $51 vs $3 annually, a gap of $48 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BJK currently yields 3.70% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
20.7% of BJK's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings BJK also owns.
BJK and IVV share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 217 days apart, BJK as of Dec 31, 2025 and IVV as of Aug 5, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
4 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BJK and 505 in IVV, against full books of 38 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 493 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for BJK (99.3% of the fund), and 11 for BJK that do not appear in IVV (31.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
20.7% of BJK is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BJK or IVV?
BJK has an expense ratio of 0.51% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $48 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, BJK or IVV?
BJK has been the more volatile fund at 27.7% annualized versus 15.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BJK -78.8% vs IVV -52.4%.
Should I hold both BJK and IVV?
BJK and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BJK and IVV?
20.7% of BJK's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.1% of IVV's is in holdings BJK also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BJK and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, BJK or IVV?
BJK yields 3.70% while IVV yields 1.10%, so BJK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than BJK?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.