BJK vs IVV
VanEck Gaming ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BJK | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.51% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $18M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.70% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -11.89% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.45% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -5.64% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -7.11% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -78.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 22, 2008 | May 15, 2000 |
BJK vs IVV Performance
VanEck Gaming ETF (BJK) is a ETF from VanEck and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BJK returned +7.45% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, BJK is down 11.89% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Over three years, BJK compounded at -5.64% per year against +22.19% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -7.11% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs +1.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BJK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.8% for BJK and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BJK charges 0.51% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $51 vs $3 annually, a gap of $48 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BJK currently yields 3.70% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BJK and IVV share 4 holdings out of 535 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BJK or IVV?
BJK has an expense ratio of 0.51% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $48 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BJK or IVV?
Over the past year BJK returned +7.45% vs +21.79% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), BJK annualized +1.52% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BJK or IVV?
BJK has been the more volatile fund at 27.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BJK -78.8% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BJK and IVV?
BJK and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BJK and IVV?
BJK and IVV share 4 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 535 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BJK or IVV?
BJK yields 3.70% while IVV yields 1.10%, so BJK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.