BJK vs VTI
VanEck Gaming ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BJK | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.51% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $18M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.70% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -11.89% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.45% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -5.64% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -7.11% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.7% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -78.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 22, 2008 | May 24, 2001 |
BJK vs VTI Performance
VanEck Gaming ETF (BJK) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BJK returned +7.45% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, BJK is down 11.89% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, BJK compounded at -5.64% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -7.11% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +1.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BJK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.7% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.8% for BJK and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BJK charges 0.51% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $51 vs $3 annually, a gap of $48 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BJK currently yields 3.70% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
BJK and VTI share 9 holdings out of 2808 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BJK or VTI?
BJK has an expense ratio of 0.51% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $48 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BJK or VTI?
Over the past year BJK returned +7.45% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), BJK annualized +1.52% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BJK or VTI?
BJK has been the more volatile fund at 27.7% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BJK -78.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BJK and VTI?
BJK and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BJK and VTI?
BJK and VTI share 9 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2808 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BJK or VTI?
BJK yields 3.70% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BJK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.