BJK vs VYM
VanEck Gaming ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BJK | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.51% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $18M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.70% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -11.89% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.45% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -5.64% | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -7.11% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.7% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -78.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 22, 2008 | Nov 10, 2006 |
BJK vs VYM Performance
VanEck Gaming ETF (BJK) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BJK returned +7.45% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, BJK is down 11.89% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Over three years, BJK compounded at -5.64% per year against +18.43% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -7.11% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.09% annualized vs +1.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BJK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.7% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.8% for BJK and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BJK charges 0.51% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $51 vs $4 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BJK currently yields 3.70% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
BJK and VYM share 1 holdings out of 591 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BJK | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| LVS | 5.85% | 0.08% | 5.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BJK or VYM?
BJK has an expense ratio of 0.51% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BJK or VYM?
Over the past year BJK returned +7.45% vs +26.05% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), BJK annualized +1.52% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BJK or VYM?
BJK has been the more volatile fund at 27.7% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: BJK -78.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both BJK and VYM?
BJK and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BJK and VYM?
BJK and VYM share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 591 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BJK or VYM?
BJK yields 3.70% while VYM yields 2.86%, so BJK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.