BJK vs VYM
VanEck Gaming ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, BJK or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BJK | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.51% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $18M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.70% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 38 | 613 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.7% | 14.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -78.8% | -54.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 18.2 years | $13,159 | $36,792Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 58.8% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jan 22, 2008 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 149 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. BJK has data through Apr 8, 2026 and VYM through Sep 4, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 18.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 24, 2008 to Apr 8, 2026 (18.2 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BJK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.7% compared with 14.9% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -78.8% for BJK and -54.3% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BJK charges 0.51% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $51 vs $4 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BJK currently yields 3.70% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
7.2% of BJK's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.1% of VYM's money is in holdings BJK also owns.
BJK and VYM share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 181 days apart, BJK as of Dec 31, 2025 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
2 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BJK and 603 in VYM, against full books of 38 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 568 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for BJK (97.4% of the fund), and 13 for BJK that do not appear in VYM (45.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BJK and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BJK or VYM?
BJK has an expense ratio of 0.51% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, BJK or VYM?
BJK has been the more volatile fund at 27.7% annualized versus 14.9% for VYM. Worst drawdown: BJK -78.8% vs VYM -54.3%.
Should I hold both BJK and VYM?
BJK and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BJK and VYM?
7.2% of BJK's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.1% of VYM's is in holdings BJK also owns. They hold 2 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in BJK and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, BJK or VYM?
BJK yields 3.70% while VYM yields 2.24%, so BJK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than BJK?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.