BKCI vs IVV
BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKCI | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $134M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.33% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 33 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +5.02% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.62% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.85% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
BKCI vs IVV Performance
BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) is a ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BKCI returned +9.62% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, BKCI is up 5.02% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Over three years, BKCI compounded at +6.85% per year against +22.19% for IVV. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs +1.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKCI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.0% for BKCI and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKCI charges 0.65% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKCI currently yields 1.33% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BKCI and IVV share 0 holdings out of 533 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKCI or IVV?
BKCI has an expense ratio of 0.65% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BKCI or IVV?
Over the past year BKCI returned +9.62% vs +21.79% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), BKCI annualized +1.98% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BKCI or IVV?
BKCI has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BKCI -31.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BKCI and IVV?
BKCI and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BKCI and IVV?
BKCI and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 533 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKCI or IVV?
BKCI yields 1.33% while IVV yields 1.10%, so BKCI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.