BKCI vs VOO
BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKCI | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $134M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.33% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 33 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +4.11% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.25% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +6.91% | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BKCI vs VOO Performance
BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) is a ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BKCI returned +8.25% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, BKCI is up 4.11% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, BKCI compounded at +6.91% per year against +21.79% for VOO. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.45% annualized vs +1.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKCI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.0% for BKCI and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKCI charges 0.65% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKCI currently yields 1.33% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BKCI and VOO share 0 holdings out of 533 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKCI or VOO?
BKCI has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BKCI or VOO?
Over the past year BKCI returned +8.25% vs +20.92% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), BKCI annualized +1.78% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BKCI or VOO?
BKCI has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BKCI -31.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BKCI and VOO?
BKCI and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BKCI and VOO?
BKCI and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 533 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKCI or VOO?
BKCI yields 1.33% while VOO yields 1.08%, so BKCI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.