BKCI vs VYM
BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKCI | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $134M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.33% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 33 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +4.87% | +15.60% | |
| 1Y Return | +9.54% | +23.48% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.18% | +19.07% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.50% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.0% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
BKCI vs VYM Performance
BNY Mellon Concentrated International ETF (BKCI) is a ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BKCI returned +9.54% while VYM returned +23.48%. Year to date, BKCI is up 4.87% versus a gain of 15.60% for VYM.
Over three years, BKCI compounded at +7.18% per year against +19.07% for VYM. Across the full 5-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs +1.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BKCI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.0% for BKCI and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKCI charges 0.65% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $4 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKCI currently yields 1.33% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
BKCI and VYM share 0 holdings out of 631 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKCI or VYM?
BKCI has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BKCI or VYM?
Over the past year BKCI returned +9.54% vs +23.48% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), BKCI annualized +1.94% vs +7.05% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BKCI or VYM?
BKCI has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: BKCI -31.0% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both BKCI and VYM?
BKCI and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BKCI and VYM?
BKCI and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 631 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKCI or VYM?
BKCI yields 1.33% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.