BKGI vs VXUS

BKGI vs VXUS

Which is better, BKGI or VXUS?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. BKGI led over 3Y, VXUS over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VXUSHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBKGIVXUS
Expense Ratio0.55%0.05%Best
AUM$1.6B$158.1B
Dividend Yield2.95%2.51%
Holdings388,747
YTD Return+6.48%+12.82%Best
1Y Return+13.83%+19.86%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+19.38%Best+19.33%
5Y Return (annualized)-+9.46%
Volatility (annualized)13.6%12.7%Best
Max Drawdown-14.8%-13.6%Best
$10,000 over 3.9 years$19,837$20,607Best
Fund FamilyBNY Mellon Investment ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 2, 2022Jan 26, 2011

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 3, 2022 to Sep 18, 2026 (3.9 years).

BKGI vs VXUS growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.

BKGI vs VXUS Performance

BNY Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) is an ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BKGI returned +13.83% while VXUS returned +19.86%. Year to date, BKGI is up 6.48% versus a gain of 12.82% for VXUS.

Over three years, BKGI compounded at +19.38% per year against +19.33% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +20.37% annualized vs +19.20%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

BKGI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 12.7% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.8% for BKGI and -13.6% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BKGI charges 0.55% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $5 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKGI currently yields 2.95% against 2.51% for VXUS.

Holdings Overlap

BKGI already in VXUS46.6%

At least 46.6% of BKGI's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.

Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 88.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

14 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in BKGI and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 38 and 8,747.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BKGIWeight in VXUSDifference
NTGY:MAGas Natural Sdg Sa7.48%0.03%7.45%
ENB:CAEnbridge Inc.7.18%0.27%6.91%
AENA:MAAena Sme Sa5.88%0.05%5.83%
BOUY:PABouygues Sa3.99%0.03%3.96%
IG:MIItalgas Spa2.96%0.01%2.95%
FOT:FIFortum Oyj2.90%0.02%2.88%
DRX:LNDrax Group Ord2.85%0.01%2.84%
PNN:LNPennon Group Plc2.52%0.01%2.51%
VIE:PAVie Fp Veolia Environnement Sa2.36%0.06%2.30%
SGEF:PAVinci Sa2.14%0.15%1.99%

46.6% of BKGI is already inside VXUS.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

BKGIVXUS

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BKGI or VXUS?

BKGI has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $50 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, BKGI or VXUS?

Over the past year BKGI returned +13.83% vs +19.86% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BKGI annualized +19.20% vs +20.37% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, BKGI or VXUS?

BKGI has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 12.7% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: BKGI -14.8% vs VXUS -13.6%.

Should I hold both BKGI and VXUS?

BKGI and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between BKGI and VXUS?

At least 46.6% of BKGI's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in BKGI and 8,082 in VXUS.

Which pays a higher dividend, BKGI or VXUS?

BKGI yields 2.95% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so BKGI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VXUS better than BKGI?

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. BKGI led over 3Y, VXUS over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.