BKGI vs VOO
BNY Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKGI | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.3B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.90% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +9.10% | +12.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.87% | +21.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.67% | +22.06% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BKGI vs VOO Performance
BNY Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) is a ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BKGI returned +14.87% while VOO returned +21.87%. Year to date, BKGI is up 9.10% versus a gain of 12.68% for VOO.
Over three years, BKGI compounded at +21.67% per year against +22.06% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, BKGI has the edge at +20.39% annualized vs +13.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 13.6% for BKGI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.8% for BKGI and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKGI charges 0.55% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKGI currently yields 2.90% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
BKGI and VOO share 7 holdings out of 528 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKGI or VOO?
BKGI has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BKGI or VOO?
Over the past year BKGI returned +14.87% vs +21.87% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BKGI annualized +20.39% vs +13.47% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BKGI or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 13.6% for BKGI. Worst drawdown: BKGI -14.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BKGI and VOO?
BKGI and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BKGI and VOO?
BKGI and VOO share 7 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 528 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKGI or VOO?
BKGI yields 2.90% while VOO yields 1.08%, so BKGI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.