BKGI vs VYM
BNY Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKGI | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $1.3B | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.90% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +9.10% | +15.34% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.87% | +23.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.67% | +19.22% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.6% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
BKGI vs VYM Performance
BNY Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF (BKGI) is a ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BKGI returned +14.87% while VYM returned +23.24%. Year to date, BKGI is up 9.10% versus a gain of 15.34% for VYM.
Over three years, BKGI compounded at +21.67% per year against +19.22% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, BKGI has the edge at +20.39% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 13.6% for BKGI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.8% for BKGI and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKGI charges 0.55% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $4 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKGI currently yields 2.90% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
BKGI and VYM share 5 holdings out of 628 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKGI or VYM?
BKGI has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $51 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BKGI or VYM?
Over the past year BKGI returned +14.87% vs +23.24% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BKGI annualized +20.39% vs +7.04% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BKGI or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 13.6% for BKGI. Worst drawdown: BKGI -14.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both BKGI and VYM?
BKGI and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BKGI and VYM?
BKGI and VYM share 5 common holdings with a 0.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 628 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKGI or VYM?
BKGI yields 2.90% while VYM yields 2.24%, so BKGI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.