BLKC vs VTI
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BLKC | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 21.31% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 85 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -15.28% | +13.67% | |
| 1Y Return | -2.78% | +22.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +38.07% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 42.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -72.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 7, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
BLKC vs VTI Performance
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF (BLKC) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BLKC returned -2.78% while VTI returned +22.17%. Year to date, BLKC is down 15.28% versus a gain of 13.67% for VTI.
Over three years, BLKC compounded at +38.07% per year against +21.93% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.11% annualized vs +2.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BLKC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 42.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -72.8% for BLKC and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BLKC charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BLKC currently yields 21.31% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BLKC or VTI?
BLKC has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BLKC or VTI?
Over the past year BLKC returned -2.78% vs +22.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BLKC annualized +2.34% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BLKC or VTI?
BLKC has been the more volatile fund at 42.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BLKC -72.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both BLKC and VTI?
BLKC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, BLKC or VTI?
BLKC yields 21.31% while VTI yields 1.07%, so BLKC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.