BLKC vs VXUS
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BLKC | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $4M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 21.31% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 85 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -15.28% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | -2.78% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +38.07% | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 42.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -72.8% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 7, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
BLKC vs VXUS Performance
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF (BLKC) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BLKC returned -2.78% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, BLKC is down 15.28% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Over three years, BLKC compounded at +38.07% per year against +20.34% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.89% annualized vs +2.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BLKC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 42.4% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -72.8% for BLKC and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BLKC charges 0.60% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $5 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BLKC currently yields 21.31% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BLKC or VXUS?
BLKC has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $55 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BLKC or VXUS?
Over the past year BLKC returned -2.78% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BLKC annualized +2.34% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BLKC or VXUS?
BLKC has been the more volatile fund at 42.4% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: BLKC -72.8% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both BLKC and VXUS?
BLKC and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, BLKC or VXUS?
BLKC yields 21.31% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so BLKC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.