BLKC vs VOO
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BLKC | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 21.31% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 85 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -15.28% | +12.95% | |
| 1Y Return | -2.78% | +20.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +38.07% | +22.09% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 42.4% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -72.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 7, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
BLKC vs VOO Performance
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF (BLKC) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BLKC returned -2.78% while VOO returned +20.69%. Year to date, BLKC is down 15.28% versus a gain of 12.95% for VOO.
Over three years, BLKC compounded at +38.07% per year against +22.09% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.50% annualized vs +2.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BLKC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 42.4% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -72.8% for BLKC and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BLKC charges 0.60% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BLKC currently yields 21.31% against 1.08% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BLKC or VOO?
BLKC has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BLKC or VOO?
Over the past year BLKC returned -2.78% vs +20.69% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BLKC annualized +2.34% vs +13.50% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BLKC or VOO?
BLKC has been the more volatile fund at 42.4% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: BLKC -72.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both BLKC and VOO?
BLKC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, BLKC or VOO?
BLKC yields 21.31% while VOO yields 1.08%, so BLKC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.