BLKC vs IVV
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BLKC | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 21.31% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 85 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | -15.28% | +13.22% | |
| 1Y Return | -2.78% | +21.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +38.07% | +22.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.42% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 42.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -72.8% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 7, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
BLKC vs IVV Performance
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF (BLKC) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BLKC returned -2.78% while IVV returned +21.62%. Year to date, BLKC is down 15.28% versus a gain of 13.22% for IVV.
Over three years, BLKC compounded at +38.07% per year against +22.17% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.02% annualized vs +2.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BLKC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 42.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -72.8% for BLKC and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BLKC charges 0.60% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BLKC currently yields 21.31% against 1.10% for IVV.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BLKC or IVV?
BLKC has an expense ratio of 0.60% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BLKC or IVV?
Over the past year BLKC returned -2.78% vs +21.62% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), BLKC annualized +2.34% vs +7.02% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BLKC or IVV?
BLKC has been the more volatile fund at 42.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: BLKC -72.8% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BLKC and IVV?
BLKC and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, BLKC or IVV?
BLKC yields 21.31% while IVV yields 1.10%, so BLKC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.