BRKD vs SH
Direxion Daily BRKB Bear 1X ETF vs ProShares Short S&P500
Which is better, BRKD or SH?
BRKD has been ahead.
SH has a lower expense ratio. BRKD led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BRKD | SH |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.89%Best |
| AUM | $1M | $977M |
| Dividend Yield | 2.82% | 4.28% |
| Holdings | 7 | 16 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.8% | 11.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -17.9%Best | -26.6% |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $10,083Best | $9,182 |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | ProShares |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Trading-Inverse Equity | Trading-Inverse Equity |
| Inception | Dec 11, 2024 | Jun 19, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 186 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. BRKD has data through Apr 10, 2026 and SH through Oct 13, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 11, 2024 to Apr 10, 2026 (1.3 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BRKD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 11.3% for SH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.9% for BRKD and -26.6% for SH. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.28. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BRKD charges 1.00% per year while SH charges 0.89%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $89 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BRKD currently yields 2.82% against 4.28% for SH.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 3 holdings in BRKD and 1 in SH, totalling 99.9% and 83.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 227 days apart, BRKD as of Jan 30, 2026 and SH as of Sep 14, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 3 positions we hold weights for in BRKD and 1 in SH, against full books of 7 and 16.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BRKD and SH you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BRKD or SH?
BRKD has an expense ratio of 1.00% while SH charges 0.89%. SH is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, BRKD or SH?
BRKD has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 11.3% for SH. Worst drawdown: BRKD -17.9% vs SH -26.6%.
Should I hold both BRKD and SH?
BRKD and SH have a monthly-return correlation of -0.28, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BRKD or SH?
BRKD yields 2.82% while SH yields 4.28%, so SH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SH better than BRKD?
SH has a lower expense ratio. BRKD led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.