BSCR vs PFIG
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Which is better, BSCR or PFIG?
BSCR has been ahead.
BSCR has a lower expense ratio. BSCR led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSCR | PFIG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10%Best | 0.22% |
| AUM | $4.6B | $122M |
| Dividend Yield | 4.24% | 4.48% |
| Holdings | 975 | 1,635 |
| YTD Return | +2.37%Best | -1.41% |
| 1Y Return | +3.45%Best | -0.58% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.95%Best | +5.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.63%Best | +1.00% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.4% | 4.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -17.3% | -15.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $10,842Best | $10,510 |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Inception | Sep 26, 2017 | Sep 15, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight, Style.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 27, 2017 to Oct 13, 2026 (9 years).
BSCR vs PFIG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9 years both funds cover.
BSCR vs PFIG Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BSCR returned +3.45% while PFIG returned -0.58%. Year to date, BSCR is up 2.37% versus a loss of 1.41% for PFIG.
Over three years, BSCR compounded at +5.95% per year against +5.29% for PFIG; over five years the annualized figures are +1.63% and +1.00% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, BSCR has the edge at +2.01% annualized vs +1.19%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BSCR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 5.4% compared with 4.9% for PFIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.3% for BSCR and -15.6% for PFIG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSCR charges 0.10% per year while PFIG charges 0.22%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $22 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSCR currently yields 4.24% against 4.48% for PFIG.
Holdings Overlap
At least 9.5% of BSCR's money is in holdings PFIG also owns.
Stated as a floor: for PFIG, our book for it covers 92.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
BSCR and PFIG share little of their money.
32 positions in common, counted across the 476 positions we hold weights for in BSCR and 745 in PFIG, against full books of 975 and 1,635.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in BSCR | Weight in PFIG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFT 3.3 02/06/27Microsoft Corp 3.3% 06Feb2027 | 0.91% | 0.44% | 0.47% |
| C 4.45 09/29/27Citigroup Inc 4.45 09/29/2027 | 0.89% | 0.37% | 0.52% |
| BAC 3.248 10/21/27 MBank Of America Corp 3.248% Oct 21 27 | 0.56% | 0.43% | 0.13% |
| MS 3.625 01/20/27Morgan Stanley 3.625 01/20/2027 | 0.68% | 0.30% | 0.38% |
| META 3.5 08/15/27Meta Platforms Inc 3.5% Aug 15, 2027 | 0.60% | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| QCOM 3.25 05/20/27Qualcomm Inc | 0.45% | 0.16% | 0.29% |
| PM 5.125 11/17/27Philip Morris Intl Inc Sr Unsecured 11/27 5.125 | 0.35% | 0.24% | 0.11% |
| KO 1.45 06/01/27Coca-Cola Co/Th 1.45 6/27 1.4500% | 0.33% | 0.23% | 0.10% |
| GEHC 5.65 11/15/27Ge Healthcare Technologies Inc 5.65% 15Nov2027 | 0.41% | 0.08% | 0.33% |
| LUV 5.125 06/15/27Southwest Airlines Co 5.13 Jun 15, 2027 | 0.40% | 0.07% | 0.33% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BSCR and PFIG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSCR or PFIG?
BSCR has an expense ratio of 0.10% while PFIG charges 0.22%. BSCR is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BSCR or PFIG?
Over the past year BSCR returned +3.45% vs -0.58% for PFIG, so BSCR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), BSCR annualized +2.01% vs +1.19% for PFIG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BSCR or PFIG?
BSCR has been the more volatile fund at 5.4% annualized versus 4.9% for PFIG. Worst drawdown: BSCR -17.3% vs PFIG -15.6%.
Should I hold both BSCR and PFIG?
BSCR and PFIG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between BSCR and PFIG?
At least 9.5% of BSCR's money is in holdings PFIG also owns. Our book for PFIG is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 32 positions in common, counted across the 476 positions we hold weights for in BSCR and 745 in PFIG.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSCR or PFIG?
BSCR yields 4.24% while PFIG yields 4.48%, so PFIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PFIG better than BSCR?
BSCR has a lower expense ratio. BSCR led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.93. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.