BSCR vs QQQ
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
BSCR has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. BSCR offers more diversification with 492 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSCR | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $4.6B | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.27% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 492 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +2.09% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.11% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.82% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.42% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.5% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 26, 2017 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BSCR vs QQQ Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BSCR returned +4.11% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, BSCR is up 2.09% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, BSCR compounded at +5.82% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +1.42% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +2.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 5.5% for BSCR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.3% for BSCR and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSCR charges 0.10% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $18 annually, a gap of $8 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSCR currently yields 4.27% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BSCR and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 571 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSCR or QQQ?
BSCR has an expense ratio of 0.10% while QQQ charges 0.18%. BSCR is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $8 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BSCR or QQQ?
Over the past year BSCR returned +4.11% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), BSCR annualized +2.01% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSCR or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 5.5% for BSCR. Worst drawdown: BSCR -17.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BSCR and QQQ?
BSCR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSCR and QQQ?
BSCR and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 571 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSCR or QQQ?
BSCR yields 4.27% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so BSCR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.